Nature

N.1.i Network of Spaces

2.99 In the same way that the network of roads connects destinations reached primarily by vehicle, active travel should be promoted by supporting and expanding the network or routes and spaces (green infrastructure) used by pedestrians and cyclists. Development of all scales and type should contribute to the green infrastructure network.

2.100 Further information and guidance can be found in the Standards Framework for Building with Nature.

Back to top

  • Community gardens, allotments & food growing – these can include formal allotments plots, small community growing spaces or community orchards.

  • Green walls & green roofs – suitable for more urban locations, these provide opportunities for greening the street scene.

  • Natural spaces – these often-forgotten green corridors help to bring wildlife into the heart of more towns, for example via railways, rivers, roadside verges, woodland shelter belts and other transitory land.

  • Private gardens – these contribute significantly towards biodiversity within built up areas.

  • Rural areas – this accounts for the vast proportion of the Lake District and includes areas of agricultural land, woodland, moorland, fells, lakes and coastline.

  • Semi-public spaces – institutions such as schools and churches will often sit within green space. A number of the Lake's District's designed landscapes are also semi-public as they sit behind a pay barrier.

  • Squares, village greens & pocket parks – smaller areas of green space which serve the neighbourhood level and can be used for informal recreation, socialising and play.

  • Streets – streets often host a number of green features such as street trees, SuDS, raised planters and hanging baskets which bring the multiple benefits of green infrastructure into the heart of the built environment.

2.101  Existing green and blue features, including hedgerows, trees, watercourses and ponds must be retained and incorporated into designs, unless to the proposal can demonstrate net benefits to green infrastructure.

2.102 All development must reinforce the green infrastructure network both within and surrounding the site.

2.10 Private gardens should utilise mature shrub and tree species to create visual interest, year-round structure and wildlife refuge.

2.104 Native species, ideally of local provenance, will be favoured over non-native species due to their role in reinforcing the Lake District's unique landscape character and providing for local wildlife.

2.105 Where boundary features are required to plots and/or sites, use boundary features such as:

  • Dry stone walls and retaining walls
  • Hedges and hedgerows
  • Coppicing
  • Timber picket or vertical board fences
  • Metal railing

2.106 When planning, designing and implementing green infrastructure, the Natural England Green Infrastructure Framework should be consulted, particularly the Green Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide.

Back to top

Click to zoom in

Incorporating existing green and blue infrastructure into development

Existing green and blue features must be retained and incorporated into designs, unless the proposal can demonstrate net benefits to green and blue infrastructure. Examples of green and blue features which must be retained include:

  1. Hedgerows
  2. Trees / mature shrubs
  3. Ponds
  4. Watercourses / ditches
  5. Public footpaths and links such as river crossings
  • Hedges provide a habitat-rich and consistent boundary feature. Windermere.

  • In some part of the Lake District there are distinctive local boundary traditions, such as this stone slab boundary at Hawkshead.

  • Here at Grasmere the old stone field boundary has been kept and a hedge added to provide privacy for these rear gardens.

  • Here at Hawkshead, the private gardens to these houses are wellscreened by a thick hedge – even in winter.

  • This low wall of Lake District stone is a characterful feature.

  • Drystone walls of different heights have been used to enclose different types of spaces. Rosthwaite.

  • In rural areas where stone walling is the norm, timber fences can look out of place.

  • High, solid gates and fences detract from the character of streets due to how defensive they look.

  • Materials and finish colour can have a big impact on the appearance of boundary features.

  • High fences usually give a poor edge to settlements and developments.

N.1.ii Open Space Provision

2.107 Development must not result in the loss of Local Green Space designations, as set out within Policy 23 – Community Facilities and Local Green Space of the Local Plan.

2.108 All developments of ten or more dwellings must include new Amenity Local Green Space.

2.109 The size and function of this new Amenity Local Green Space should be informed on a case-by-case basis using the national standards set out below. Where possible, new development and new Amenity Local Green Space should contribute towards helping communities meet these standards.

Back to top

Click to zoom in

The size and function of this new Amenity Local Green Space is to be informed on a case-by-case basis using the national standards set out below. Where possible, new development and new Amenity Local Green Space should contribute towards helping communities meet these standards.

Click to zoom in

H.2.ii Gardens and Balconies

2.110 Generally, each dwelling should be provided with private outside space. However, a larger shared space may have greater amenity, play, biodiversity, landscape, and townscape benefits, than smaller enclosed pockets.

Back to top

  • Retained drystone walls and the siting of the garage (to left) ensure private, enclosed rear gardens. Borrowdale.

  • This garden retains a field character through the retention of drystone walls and the design of gates. Borrowdale.

  • Rather than each house having a front plot, a single shared garden gives a more open outlook and enables use of the space for play. Hawkshead.

N.1.iii Open Space Design

2.111 The following checklist should be used to ensure new open spaces are designed effectively:

  • Does the new open space look to the character of its surrounding area for cues on design?
  • Has the new open space been designed with consideration for existing and future local need?
  • Is the new open space accessible and overlooked by surrounding properties?
  • Are the new open space's access points convenient and relate to desire lines?
  • Is the new open space centrally located within the new development to form a focal point?
  • Does the new open space contribute positively to the sense of place of the development and surrounding area?
  • Is the new open space multifunctional and provide benefits relating to biodiversity, sustainable drainage and plant life that will absorb carbon?
  • Does the new open space contribute towards the free movement of wildlife by acting as a stepping stone or linking feature with surrounding habitat?
  • Does the new open space provide opportunities for play and social interactions where possible?
  • Has the new open space been designed to ensure onerous maintenance regimes are kept to a minimum?
  • Does the open space have physical boundaries and if so, are these needed?
  • Is sufficient lighting provided for the context of the open space without causing light spillage to surrounding properties and/or the sky?
  • Do the design and soft landscaping reduce the impacts of noise and sound travelling? Hard surfaces and structures will encourage noise to travel whereas soft planting, trees and hedges will absorb sound.
  • Are new surfaces, materials, boundaries and street furniture high quality, robust, and use naturalistic and locally distinctive materials where possible?
  • Has there been an effort to include new tree and vegetation species that as a priority are native?
  • Are the selected plant species of high wildlife value (such as pollinator-friendly plants) and are the species non-invasive?
  • Are new play spaces, including equipped play, visually attractive? Do they make use of natural features, such as rocks, trees, topography and water, and utilise natural materials, such as timber and stone?
  • Does the new open space appeal to people of all ages, including forgotten demographics such as teenage girls and those with dementia.
  • Does the new open space provide opportunity for community growing?
  • Back to top

2.112  Native tree and planting species of local provenance should be prioritised within new open space. Tree species should have regard to the ground conditions of the site, the landscape or townscape character of the site, the tree’s resilience to future climate change and the tree’s function: is it for amenity or for play? Designers are encouraged to utilise the palette of tree species provided within the Street Trees section to guide the appropriate selection and siting of various native species. Designers are also recommended to use the Tree Species Selection for Green Infrastructure Guide for additional information on which species thrive where.

  • Well-designed natural play features can be engaging for all ages, including adults.

  • The use of natural materials, particularly wood, helps to blend the play space in with its surroundings. Weaving features through the tree line can also help to integrate the space.

  • Play equipment can be as simple as felled tree trunks and stumps. If sourced locally, it can be an extremely sustainable option.

N.2.i Working with Water

2.113 New development that is adjacent to water must respond sensitively to the ecological, recreational and visual amenity of the asset, as well as have consideration for the flood risk that it can pose, and the potential for contaminated run-off. Within the Lake District, water can include lakes, rivers, streams, ponds, wetlands, estuaries and the sea.

2.114 The following checklist must be used to ensure new development that is located adjacent to water is designed sensitively:

  • Has a sufficient buffer zone been left between new built form and the waterbody to allow for management (ideally 5m+)?
  • Has a sufficient buffer zone been left between built form and the waterbody to allow space for wildlife? For lake shores the buffer should be at least 5m.
  • Has sufficient space been left to allow for future flood defences, if appropriate?
  • Has flood risk, including fluvial, marine, surface water and ground water, been considered within the design and siting of the development?
  • Have opportunities to naturalise banks or enhance riparian edges for habitat been explored?
  • Has the habitat and biodiversity potential of the water body been enhanced through the scheme?
  • Where schemes adjoin watercourses, has effort been made to create walking and cycling routes along their course, where appropriate?
  • Is their passive surveillance of the water body from neighbouring properties?
  • Does the waterbody form a focal point within new green space?
  • Does the water body contribute positively towards the character of the scheme?
  • Could the scheme have an adverse impact on water quality within the waterbody, and have opportunities to enhance water quality through the scheme been explored?

2.115 Particular design considerations must be given to schemes that are located on lake shores due to the prominence of their position in views from the lake and from other shores.

  • Primary frontages must be delivered on both the road-facing and lake-facing sides of the building to preserve visual amenity from both aspects.
  • Where detached dwellings sit within large plots along lake shores, gaps between adjoining properties should be retained to allow for glimpsed views of the lake and opposite shores.
  • New or upgraded boat houses should match the scale of existing or surrounding boat houses. The use of traditional local building materials is encouraged, as is the sensitive contemporary interpretation of these building styles.
  • Existing trees and mature vegetation must be retained on sites unless for exceptional reasons. New tree planting is encouraged to soften views of new built form and to help integrate it into the wider landscape.
  • Dwellings along lake shores should retain expanses of open gardens and lawn adjacent to the water. Built form up to and on the water's edge should be limited to boat houses.

Back to top

  • Here at Staveley, riparian vegetation along the River Kent has been retained adjacent to new development. This not only supports the local and strategic nature network, but helps to soften views towards new built form and provide privacy for occupiers.

N.2.ii Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)

2.116 All new development must integrate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) that achieve greenfield run-off rates. This must be demonstrated through a site-specific drainage strategy.

2.117 In all development situations, the SuDS Management Train must be applied, as illustrated below. Surface water that is captured and managed above-ground on site for non-potable uses, such as irrigation, will always be favoured.

Back to top

Click to zoom in

Sustainable Drainage Hierarchy

  1. Rainwater used as a resource, for example rainwater harvesting, blue roofs for irrigation.
  2. Rainwater infiltration to ground at or close to source.
  3. Rainwater attenuation in green infrastructure features in the wider site for gradual release, for example rain gardens and swales.
  4. Rainwater discharged to watercourse, unless not appropriate.
  5. Controlled rainwater discharge to a surface water sewer or drain.
  6. Controlled rainwater discharge to a combined sewer.

2.118 SuDS must be considered in the early stages of design and, where possible, incorporated within highway and open space design. Multifunctional SuDS that also allow for biodiversity and recreation will be favoured.

Back to top

2.119 The form, function and design of SuDS will vary on a site-by-site basis depending on topography, ground conditions, permeability, contamination potential, adjacent watercourses and the sensitivity of groundwater receptors.

2.120 Where sites have been previously developed, the potential for ‘de-paving’ redundant or unnecessary sealed surfaces and replacing this with SuDS should be explored.

Back to top

2.121 The design of new SuDS must carefully, yet imaginatively, respond to local character and the setting of the scheme:

  • For developments located within towns and village cores, more formal and manicured SuDS, such as constructed rain gardens, rills and swales, may be appropriate and provide a valuable contribution towards enhancing the character of the development.
  • For developments located within the rural fringes, more naturalistic SuDS, including soft-sided swales, vegetated ditches, attenuation ponds and wetlands will be more appropriate.

2.122 The creative use of permeable paving and gullies that respond to their context is encouraged.

Back to top

2.123 Planting choice within SuDS must provide for biodiversity and pollinators. Trees and larger specimens are encouraged where appropriate to context. The use of native plant and tree species is required.

2.124 SuDS should contribute to amenity and biodiversity. For these reasons ‘pipe to basin’ SuDS where runoff is channelled into an underground tank must only be used as a last resort to manage water runoff from a site.

2.125 The longevity of SuDS and their ongoing maintenance must be secured for the lifetime of the development.

2.126 Applicants should refer to the SuDS Manual for detailed guidance on the correct application of SuDS in their scheme, including calculating and using greenfield run-off rates.

Back to top

  • Example of a vegetated swale with soft sides and native species. These types of naturalistic SuDS can be appropriate in rural or settlement edge locations.

  • Existing features such as streams and ditches can be incorporated within the SuDS network to help support surface water management in a sustainable manner which is sensitive to the character of its surroundings.

  • Example of how an artificially constructed wetland can be both naturalistic in character and serve local biodiversity.

  • Example of constructed rain garden with ornamental species which are more suited to town centres. Credit: India Hobson.

  • Example of constructed rain gardens with ornamental species which are more suited to town centres.

N.2.iii Flood Risk

2.127 Designs must reduce flood risk at every opportunity. However, if a risk still exists, flood avoidance measures should be demonstrated in the proposal. These can include:

  • Locating buildings on the lowest risk parts of the site;
  • Raising floor levels above predicted flood levels; and
  • Using upper storeys of buildings for habitable space, saving ground floors for less vulnerable uses, such as garages, that are designed in line with the Code of practice for property flood resilience to ensure quick recoveries if flooding occurs.
  • Back to top

N.3.ii Biodiversity

2.128 Ecological surveys and assessment should be undertaken prior to site design, so that the presence of sensitive sites, habitats and species informs the site layout or masterplanning stage. Early consideration of ecological constraints and opportunities help to underpin accurate design, budget and programme planning.

2.129 Development should contribute to nature recovery through the creation of more areas of wildlife-rich habitat in bigger patches, of better quality, that are more joined-up (see Cumbria Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS)).

Back to top

N.3.i Biodiversity Net Gain

2.130 All development must:

  • Refer to the Biodiversity SPD.
  • Avoid adverse impact on biodiversity wherever possible. At the design stage, this includes avoidance of habitat loss or provision of appropriate buffers to retained or adjacent features of value. At the construction stage, this may include interventions to prevent the spread of non-native invasive species such as giant hogweed, and/or safeguarding of protected species such as otter.
  • Minimise any unavoidable adverse impacts, for example, reinstatement of habitat temporarily lost to construction access, timing works to avoid sensitive times of year (as informed be a qualified ecologist). Unavoidable impacts will be reflected in the nature and scale of BNG requirement for each proposed development site.
  • Mitigate for unavoidable impacts on habitats and species, such as the provision of bird nest boxes where tree or hedgerow nesting habitat is lost, and replacement habitats take time to establish.
  • Compensate for unavoidable is considered only after all possibilities for avoidance etc have been exhausted. If compensating for losses within the development footprint is not possible or does not generate adequate or appropriate compensation, off-site (off-set) options may be considered. Examples on how to deliver biodiversity within the mitigation hierarchy are set out within the Biodiversity SPD.

2.131 The priority is to retain and enhance existing habitat features of local biodiversity importance (see LNRS), for example, species-rich grasslands – both hay meadows and pasture in the low-lying valleys and lower slopes.

2.132 Any loss of habitat should be reinstated, for example reinstating hedgerows around the boundary or, where this is not possible, compensated. A qualified ecologist will make locally appropriate recommendations for biodiversity enhancements as part of the ecological assessment process.

2.133 BNG, and more general ecological enhancements delivered as part of development, should be locally appropriate and contribute to the Nature Recovery Network. As part of this network, BNG or general enhancements contribute to the reinstatement, restoration or reintroduction of local conservation priority species (as part of the emerging LNRS, an updated list of Priority Cumbria Species will be developed). The Building with Nature standards or emerging tools such as the Environmental Benefits for Nature Tool or the NATURE Tool can be used to find locally-appropriate restoration planting schemes

2.134 Habitat retained, enhanced or created must be managed to ensure this establishes as intended and is maintained in the long term. Habitat delivered as BNG has a minimum management legacy of 30 years.

2.135 All development, should result in improvements for biodiversity. Sites which do not contain habitats to start with such as change of use applications and those entirely comprising buildings and sealed surfaces (excluding the conversion of traditional barns) are not subject to formal BNG requirements.

2.136 Development which is subject to the BNG obligations must deliver a minimum of 10% Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) to be maintained for a minimum period of 30 years. Recognising variability in local ecological character across the Lake District, appropriate BNG requirements will be informed by an ecological assessment and use of the latest version of the Defra Biodiversity Metric by a qualified ecologist. A Biodiversity Gain Plan setting out the BNG committed to will form part of the ecological assessment submitted with the planning application.

2.137 Development must avoid impacts on designated sites and irreplaceable habitat as defined by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) including:

  • ancient woodland,
  • ancient and veteran trees,
  • ancient grasslands (unimproved and some semi-improved species-rich grasslands),
  • blanket bog,
  • limestone pavement,
  • sand dunes,
  • salt marsh and
  • lowland fen.

2.138 Impacts in this context include direct impacts (e.g., loss or severance habitats to development) or indirect impacts (e.g., increased footfall resulting in deterioration of habitats or disturbance of species or increased surface water runoff).

2.139 A minimum 15m aspiring to a 30m buffer of semi-natural habitats should be applied between development and ancient woodland. These are mapped in the Local Nature Recovery basemap. Where assessment shows other impacts are likely to extend beyond 15m, the development is likely to need a larger buffer zone. Determination and creation of buffer zones should follow Natural England and Forestry Commission Guidance: Ancient woodland, ancient trees and veteran trees: advice for making planning decisions.

2.140 Developments should retain or create an appropriate buffer distance from the top of the bank of watercourses (to be determined by the ecological assessment). The buffer zone should contain natural and semi-natural habitats, such as trees, wetland, scrub or grassland, which can protect water quality, stabilise banks and provide biodiversity value. Recreational access within this zone should be sensitively designed to avoid risk of habitat degradation or species disturbance during and post construction.

2.141 Development must avoid potential impact on protected species. Where this is not possible, the Natural England licensing requirements apply (determined in the ecological assessment in light of the unavoidable impacts at the application site).

2.142 New development should balance introduction of impermeable built surface through provision of an enhanced network of wetland features including ponds, naturalised surface SuDS or ephemeral ditches to support invertebrates, amphibians and birds.

2.143 Avoid the use of hard boundaries around private spaces, unless it is traditional stone walls, and instead retain, restore, and expand on existing hedgerows to provide habitat connectivity across the site and allow for species movement. New hedge planting should be set back approximately 3m from the boundary to allow space for growth. Manage hedges to maintain structural diversity. Non-native hedge species must be avoided.

2.144 Retained trees and hedgerows require adequate root protection zone to ensure their longevity. Their function as part of a habitat mosaic can be optimised through creation and enhancement of adjacent and overhanging / underlying features, such as species-rich grassland verges alongside hedgerows, wet ditches and ponds. Appropriate dimensions and position within the sites will be guided by the ecological assessment, taking into account the site context (topography, substrate/s, proposed shading, etc) and biological requirements of target species.

2.145 Native woodland, shrub, and hedgerows planting should reflect local landscape character and plant typologies.

2.146 Roost and nest boxes for wildlife should be integrated to built development or as part of the wider scheme. Ranging from bird and bat boxes to bug hotels these will be selected for local species, sited at the appropriate height and aspect, and be connected to habitat which allows the target species to successfully establish in. Nest boxes must comply with the relevant British Standard: BS 42021:2022.

2.147 Roosts, nest boxes and microhabitats can be used to attract wildlife that is currently absent to the site. For example, the incorporation of swift bricks in places where swifts are not presently recorded will assist with nature recovery by providing the necessary habitat.

2.148 Development should achieve a variety of physical structures on-site to provide a wider range of microhabitats, niches and microclimates for species. Examples include standing and fallen dead wood, scrub, and a range of vegetation conditions from patches of open ground to very dense vegetation.

2.149 Proposed lighting – both external and internal light spill – should respect habitat areas retained and created on site. Artificial light should avoid areas (including dispersal routes and foraging areas) intended for nocturnal or crepuscular (twilight) species for risk of deterring their use. General guidance provided by the Good Lighting Technical Advisory Note, the Institute of Lighting Professional Guidance and the Bat Conservation Trust addresses parameters including light levels, direction, duration and reflective glare. Specific information will be provided in the ecological assessment.

Back to top

2.150 Planting trees, shrubs, climbers and ground plants offers significant opportunity to benefit biodiversity as part of sensitive development. Key considerations are to incorporate a diverse selection of locally-appropriate species, suitable to the soil type and ground conditions. Selection of species resilient to climate change means those better able to cope with the more extreme and fluctuating seasonal conditions in the context of the site (prone to flooding, drought, etc). Inclusion of a diverse mix will also promote resilience. Selection of fruiting, nectar-rich and berry-bearing species which collectively provide a foraging resource for wildlife throughout the year is beneficial. In addition to the Cumbria PLAN BEE for pollinators, wildlife-friendly planting lists are available from a range of recognised bodies including the RHS, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, RSPB and Bug life.

Back to top

2.151 Artificial grass must not be used as it has no ecological value and introduces ecological harms by removing grass habitat and introducing and impermeable plastic surface.

Click to zoom in

Nature and Habitat Buffer Distances

1. New development that is adjacent to water must respond sensitively to the ecological, recreational and visual amenity of the asset, as well as have consideration for the flood risk that it can pose. Within the Lake District, water can include lakes, rivers, streams, ponds, wetlands, estuaries and the sea.

2. Particular design considerations must be given to schemes that are located on lake shores due to the prominence of their position in views from the lake and from other shores.

2a. Primary façades must be delivered on both the road-facing and lake-facing sides of the property to preserve visual amenity from both aspects.

2b. Where detached dwellings sit within large plots along lake shores, gaps between adjoining properties should be retained to allow for glimpsed views of the lake and opposite shores.

2c. Existing trees and mature vegetation must be retained on sites unless for exceptional reasons. New tree planting is encouraged to soften views of new built form and to help integrate it into the wider landscape.

2d. Dwellings along lake shores should retain expanses of open gardens and lawn adjacent to the water. Built form up to and on the water’s edge is to be limited to boat houses

  • New or upgraded boat houses should match the scale of existing or surrounding boat houses. The use of traditional local building materials is encouraged, as is the sensitive contemporary interpretation of these building styles (see section N.2.i Nature, Working with Water in the Buildings Code for more detail).
  • All schemes must check their requirement for nutrient neutrality validation before submitting a planning application. Information regarding catchment areas subject to nutrient neutrality measures, information requirements, and types of development that are exempt can be found on the LDNPA website.
  • Back to top

  • Habitat stepping stones should be provided across built up areas to create opportunities for wildlife movement between core habitat areas, such as ancient woodland.

  • Veteran trees support a large number of native bird and invertebrate species. Like all trees, their presence should be noted from the outset of the design process and should be celebrated and incorporated into green space design within new development.

  • Situated on a tributary of the Aira Beck, Dowthwaite Farmhouse overlooks a mosaic of wet grassland, sedges and pollarded willow.

  • Mature trees, hedges and shrubs provide an important refuge for wildlife within settlements, particularly within private gardens.

  • Tussocky swards can provide important refuge for invertebrates, particularly overwintering species such as beetles and spiders. This in turn supports small mammals and birds.

  • Dry stone walls provide varied microclimates and shelter for invertebrates, reptiles and small mammals. They can even be used as nesting sites for birds. Old dry stone walls are of particular importance due to their moss and lichen assemblages.

  • Mature vegetation not only effectively screens and integrates infrastructure into the landscape, but also creates movement corridors for wildlife.

  • Undisturbed areas are essential for thriving wildlife, particularly in locations which are popular for recreation.

N.3.iii Street Trees

2.152 All new development must contribute towards the Government's aim for all new streets to be tree-lined, as set out within Paragraph 131 of the NPPF. Where possible street trees should be planted in association with kerbside rain gardens or other SuDS measures to minimise water runoff.

2.153 Native tree species of local provenance must be prioritised. However, species choice should also reflect the site's constraints, the function the tree will play within the streetscape, and future climatic pressures expected due to climate change. Designers should use the Tree Species Selection for Green Infrastructure Guide for specifying species.

2.154 The following palette of native tree species must be used to inform planting schemes. However, a creative response to each site's location and landscape character is encouraged:

Click to zoom in

  • An appropriate species in the correct amount of space will grow into a key feature of the street scene.

  • The variety of tree species gives this street an appearance that changes with the seasons.

  • Sited at the peripheries of gardens, the scattered trees in front of and behind these houses are key features of this suburban townscape.

  • In intimate and enclosed hard spaces, a single specimen tree can add a welcome splash of greenery that softens the space.

  • Trees, hedges and shrubs can provide the dual role of screening private gardens from view while also supporting wildlife.

  • Where garden sizes cannot accommodate large mature trees, communal spaces and the public realm can offer an alternative location.

  • Here the houses and access have been planned around the central open space and trees so that the trees offer amenity to every house.

  • In a village street the irregular spacing and occurrence of trees can reinforce the organic and informal character of the place.

  • Tree lines can form highly attractive edges to settlements of any size.

2.155 New street trees must be positioned with sufficient space to allow for full maturity without causing obstructions to access, junction sightlines, lighting and infrastructure.

2.156 The positioning of services and street trees must be coordinated at the outset of designs to ensure future interferences are avoided.

2.157 A diversity of street trees is encouraged to perform a variety of functions and deliver multifunctional benefits. This also enhances provisions for biodiversity and biosecurity resilience.

2.158 When street trees are being placed within paved surfaces, applicants must have regard for best practice in relation to the use of tree pits, guards and grates.

2.159 The Urban Tree Manual should be referred to for best practice guidance on the installation and maintenance of street trees. The maintenance of new streets trees, including watering and staking, must be secured for at least 3 years following planting to ensure successful establishment.

Back to top

  • This 1970s housing development has retained much older trees that dominate the skyline and form and entrance feature to the estate. Keswick.

  • This housing development of the early 2000s has retained one end of a distinctive mature tree line at the edge of Hawkshead.

  • This cul de sac in Windermere is dominated by retained mature trees that provide an attractive outlook for the houses.

Next chapter

Movement

Newly built houses on a riverside

Other Design Code chapters

Context and character

Built Form

Identity

Resources

Movement

Return to Design Code home page